66|0007|173|02
10th June 2020
Am
I witnessing the good governance of a developed country whereby the mechanisms
to lift the country and every citizen to a position whereby every citizen is
included and anti-corruption methods become so much the norm that everyone
benefits. I believe we are not
witnessing good governance but the opposite of it.
The
rushing through of the Coronavirus Act 2020 suggests not only that the fight
against anti-corruption is in reverse and with the actions since the ‘George
Floyd murder’ by a colleague from their workplace club resulting in the
‘Domestic Terrorism’ being unleashed on the people of the UK without hindrance
and with some assistance, that the corruption goes all through the agencies of
government and their sub-agencies. None
of this ‘deep and governance’ nor the actions, or inactions, are mandated by the
crown’s subjects and because they harm those very subjects, the actions of those
in the management of the UK are in violation and should be removed.
It
seems that contrary to popular belief the UK is no longer ‘free’. The democratic watchdogs that measure civil
liberties and political rights appear unfree.
Has ‘Antifa’ and ‘Black Lives Matter’ ever been one of the UK’s
democratic watchdogs? How have ‘Antifa’
and ‘Black Lives Matter’ become a level of governance that means what they say
becomes instant policy? Why do those
‘governing’ immediately take up their cry, kneel and allow the destruction of
the UK’s way of life? If corruption is
all but eradicated in the UK and their institutions why is policy being rushed
through the HoC and HoL without censure or involvement of the crown’s subjects
save for certain factions? Why is the
policy coming in to effect for certain quarters immediately and without obstacle
yet the majority of people opposing or even just questioning those governing
being repressed, rejected or subjugated?
To
my mind these things are happening because the level of corruption that now
exists in the UK within the governance and because the UK is no longer a free
country. Far from being a world-leader
in democratic processes, ‘the Mother of Parliaments’ the UK government and its
institutions are the PR front for those ‘donor’ patrons.
The
people of the UK need to mobilise and wrest their country from the grip of
tyranny. It has come down to us to
become the unwitting volunteers giving
up their spare time to ‘set things straight’ in order that our ‘free future and
those of the next generations’ is once again on in our possession. The government has shown its hand and the
people have to fight the ‘enemy within’.
The first course of action needs the Conservative leader to admit to
their complicity in the ‘donor enslavement’ and either step down or confirm
their reject ion of the donor and confirm they will assist in clean this up and
the reintroduction of anti-corruption measures and back to good governance for
the better of all, not just the done few.
Everyone who has ever been involved in governance and has knowledge needs
to speak up and play their part as substitutes for those that will try to stop
and reverse the corruption. We the
people are now the ‘threshold line’.
There
is no increased level of good governance with the external aid provided to our
government and institutions which have lead to everyone being treated equally
and fairly. The Prof. Ferguson data set
upon which the government ‘acted’ was not the only data and was diametrically
opposite to many scientific voices. The
UK’s media output was played where there was agreement with the done
governmental institution, suppressing and removing dissenting or differing
opinion. The resulting picture more one
of the CCP with their approved mouthpieces and not a free, democratic and
incorruptible country. Given that the
donees influence within governance appears to be the only influence, we the
people need to be shown the ‘conditions’ attached to the donations made to the
UK government, its sub-governance machinery and associated institutions. It does appear that the conditions of the
donor required involvement in such a manner as to be the opposite of
good-governance and anti-corruption. The
people of the UK have the right to see and know those conditions of the incoming
donations.
The
outgoing donations conditions made by those governing of the UK’s public money
to done organisations and countries should also be made immediately visible. The
UK people has, for decades, been forcibly donating to countries, organisations
and institutions without there being much by way of results. Disproportionately things have not changed or
have deteriorated for the ‘intended donees’ whereas corruption and poor
governance increase. Yet the money
belonging to the UK’s people continues to flow out without controls being taken
for the failures of the aid packages.
Save the Children, Oxfam, Kids Company and the Prince Andrew Charitable
Trust just a few of the corrupt use of people’s donations – whether known or
through the mechanisms of the crown’s servants and agents. None of these “charities” presented
themselves for investigation, poor governance or corruption rather they got
caught.
There
exists a merry-go-round of donations to Foundations, foundations to Trusts,
trusts to Trustees of the crown’s subjects money made by those governing,
donations made without the knowledge or approval of those to whom the money
belongs and with opacity and secrecy.
This is not a society where anti-corruption practice is normative. The capacity of donors to push a country to
forego good governance whilst the PR and rhetoric asserts of a global crusade
against corruption must surely find the donors and donees wanting? Is the explanation and constant pushing of
claims of fighting the corruption little more than a ‘show’ for the public’s
consumption. Afterall, stating the true
position and actions would kill their own rents.
The
donors care only for their own interests ‘investing’ and this has been ‘writ
large’ in the current “Corona Virus” global’trocity, the Indian cervical cancer
trials, the occurrence of Covid-19 in papaya and goat samples of Tanzania and
the ‘track, trace apps’ affiliated to government officials.
The
affiliation of the UK’s government to the source of the Covid-19 illness as a
donor country to a CCP country, in tandem with the Gates Foundation is opaque
and not one those governing have volunteered.
Those governing the UK are actively avoiding the root of the problem
choosing their own self-serving including economic gain blindly ignoring their
duty to anti-corruption within governance.
The UK people need to step up and are obliged to volunteer their services
to question the donor motives, seek the donor conditions for and prevent aid
feeding corruption. We have no choice, this is now our obligation for those
controlling governance have failed and continue to fail us. Within the UK
governance, corruption, rather than being the exception is now the norm. The
anti-corruption tools we believed to be in place are clearly not. The donor assistance received cannot be
declared successful as we have lost control of corruption through the
prescriptions attached to those donations and the absence of integrity is
visible every night on the television updates by the donors representatives.
A
reversal of the trajectory needs to occur back to the path where the dominant
norm is that public officials are not corrupt and the majority of acts are not
corrupt taking us back to a norm of integrity of the crown’s servants agents is
dominant and private groups interests are impotent. A UK in which the endemic
‘corruption as the norm and an institutionalized practice’ is ousted; where
treating individuals according to their status through personal and
interpersonal state transactions – the use of public office for private profit
‘Vaccines, Track & Trace’, bribery, patronage, nepotism giving promotion and
advancement based on connections with those with influence rather than on
merit.
The
government and donees should produce evidence and all of it, surrounding their
donors, donations and donees for investigation into corruption and the
corruption control measures. Presently
we have a pattern of distribution showing preference of public goods towards
those holding more power – a lack of equal access, public integrity and a
closed-shop to the majority of the UK people. An allocation of resources towards
the historical discretionary method and a return to arbitrariness for those
without power. The return to bureaucrats
appointing the allocation of resources on a basis of party or personal
allegiance and the subsequent collusion in resource extraction. The offshore investment fund which avoided
having to pay tax ever in Britain and run by ex-British prime minister, David
Cameron’s father, put the governance of the UK and it’s moving away from
anti-corruption is evidence that such practices are the norm, the organised and
scale of the corruption in extracting resources disproportionately in favour of
the most powerful group.
We
should demand, starting with the current crisis’s the information on the special
interests behind the governments bills, contracts awarded, which officials have
been bribed, which information is used on the basis of favouritism or donors
involvement. That before any further decisions or laws being passed that the
information is provided for inspection by the people and not contained behind
closed doors and undertaken by those few and favourites of vested interest. Personal ties are now needed to access public
services and inducement the norm and necessary. In the UK government is working
in favour of the few and people, connections not merit, bribery to gain access
and where people are not equal in the eyes of the law and where favouritism is
the norm. To allow the practice of widespread collusion to continue by appointed
and elected office holders, civil servants and the law enforcement agencies is
to have failed our countrymen and ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment