Showing posts with label secret meetings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secret meetings. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

66| EU's Great Betrayal [China - SARS-COV-2-Pathogen - Covid-19]







The diplomatic game of chess is likely to go down to the wire as
China is actively lobbying to escape sanctions and
independent inquiry because the Chinese communist party knows it is
culpable for the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic





Earlier this week it appeared that China is on the backfoot as over 100 countries
rallied behind each other to draft a resolution in the 73rd World Health Assembly
to review the response of the World Health Organization in order to draw lessons
from it. 

Interestingly even China backed the proposal which was initially drafted by the
European Union as the world thought that it has taken the first steps to punish
China and the WHO for its sins.  However on a closer look it turns out that yet again
China has managed to fool the world.






Australia has been at the forefront of pushing for an independent investigation into
China and had drafted a proposal which demanded an independent inquiry and
threatened to put China In the dock. 








China lobbied with the European Union to fool the world and embarrass Australia

as the latter's proposal was silently junked and a watered down proposal was drafted
by the European Union which only called for a review of the WHO response in order
to draw lessons from the response much to China's delight. 



The entire world has been fooled by China into thinking that punitive measures havebeen taken by the countries in the 73rd World Health Assembly. 



The seven-page proposal does stress on investigating the origins of the virus but desists from
directly mentioning China or Wuhan.

Chinese Communist Party's mouthpiece Global Times could not contain its happiness as
it claimed that Australia got a slap on the face and openly admitted that EU's resolution
Was sponsored by China and the global community has welcomed it.  



Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said it is a totally different thing from
the so called independent inquiry pushed by the Australian side.


 
Yet again China has been successful in putting out its narrative and needless to say the
proposal which has been signed by over 100 countries is nothing but a hogwash as China
will never sponsor a proposal which can threaten it's narrative.

It is ironical that the European Union which has been arguably worst hit by the

Wuhan virus pandemic is supporting China as it cowers down under Chinese pressure.

As if to rub salt in the wounds the European Union pledged to back the WHO
after US President Donald Trump threatened to pull out of the body if the WHO is
unsuccessful in proving that it is not under Chinese influence.

European Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Virginie Battu-Henriksson said this is
the time for solidarity not the time for finger-pointing or for undermining
multilateral co-operation.

The EU backs the WHO in its efforts to contain and mitigate the Covid-19  outbreak and has already provided additional funding to support these efforts. 





In yet another example which portrays how the EU has been compromised
into serving the interests of China it recently watered down a report about
Beijing state backed disinformation campaign fearing that the Dragon would
retaliate by withholding medical supplies.


The reference to China's disinformation campaign essentially
means China's massive propaganda war to portray itself as a saviour
of the world spreading lies like the US Army spread the novel coronavirus
or scapegoating Italy as a part of Covid-19 origin propaganda or an
unnamed Chinese diplomat meddling in the internal affairs of France in an ugly
undiplomatic manner.  But this particular section was removed by the EU, why
because Beijing strong-armed it and warned the EU officials of unspecified

repercussions and then the EU gave in to the threats to appease the CCP 



Such is the Chinese influence in the European Union that it allowed China
to censor a friendship letter which was co-authored and co-signed by all
European Union ambassadors to China. 













The letter mentioned the outbreak
of the corona virus in China and its subsequent spread to the rest of the world
over the past three months has meant there are pre-existing plans have been
temporary side-tracked. But Beijing's state-run media didn't like it and
China Daily published the letter removing this paragraph about the corona virus
pandemic thereby quoting the European Union selectively.  But the EU
didn't protest and allowed China to impose its will by censoring parts of
the letter. 

Not only did the European Union fail to object but it also consented to
Chinese censorship and manipulation.  Battu-Henriksson said EU
diplomats decided to proceed with the publication with considerable
reluctance.
In retrospect it seems that - the United Kingdom's decision to leave
the European Union was the correct one.

While there are obvious economic and trade benefits by being a part of the EU
but if the institution cannot protect the lives of its citizens and directly panders
to the whims and fancies of China despite the fact that the latter's actions have
created havoc in Europe the institution has lost all credibility and no longer
serves the interests of Europe.

Sunday, May 31, 2020

66|0011|171 The timeline of the secret meetings - deliberate intentions to make the people of the UK sick/sicker/sickest/



VOBE 31 May 2020
10:58

 This is in progress so please check back & if you could sign the petitions - 323703, 32


huge gaps between evidence provided and policy decisions
throughout resulting in huge policy leaps from meeting to meeting with no evidence as to why  




SAGE MEETING DATE
SAGE NOTES

CROWN'S SERVANTS / AGENTS ACTIONS

04.02.2020
"It is possible that school closures would be less effective than in previous epidemics

SAGE heard that NERVTAG advises that there is limited to no evidence of the
benefits of the general public wearing facemasks as preventative measure."


18.02.2020
"Chloroquine represents potential treatment that is low cost and widely available. However, SAGE is unaware of any
clinical trials assessing its effectiveness"

Chloroquine is not mentioned again from this point




25.02.2020
"The risk of public disorder in the UK — defined to include opportunistic crime, community tension and rioting — is assessed to be very low in response to an epidemic"


25.02.2020
"SAGE discussed a paper modelling four non-pharmaceutical interventions: university and school closures, home isolation, household quarantine and social distancing, including use of interventions in combination"
*Lockdown looks like it came from study







27.02.2020
"SAGE reviewed Covid-19 planning assumptions and advised that, in the reasonable worst case scenario, 80% of the UK population may become infected, with an overall 1%
fatality rate in those infected" 








03.03.2020
"There is currently no evidence that cancelling large events would be effective"

This is when the behavioural science come to the fore on message and
communication 

05.03.2020
"HMG should plan for the introduction of behavioural and social interventions within 1-2 weeks to contain and delay, depending on progress of the epidemic.

SAGE claims that the science supports combination of case isolation and
whole family isolation"



05.03.2020

SAGE agreed there is no evidence to suggest that banning very large
gatherings would reduce transmission. Preventing social interaction in public spaces,
including restaurants and bars, would have an effect, but would be very difficult to
implement. 

05.03.2020

Cocooning of older and vulnerable patients can start later, and would have
to continue longer, than other measures. 

10.03.2020

Social distancing ("cocooning") is for those 70 and over, as well as those of
any age in vulnerable groups.
The modelling concludes that restricting this group to 70+, rather than 65+
would not cause significant increase in numbers of deaths. 

16.03.2020
"The science" suggests additional social distancing measures should be introduced as soon as possible
While SAGE's view remains that school closures constitutes one of the less effective single measure to reduce the epidemic peak, „„it may nevertheless become necessary to
introduce school closures in order to push demand for critical care below



23.03.2020







26.03.2020
"Prepare public for hospital admission" via Gov message




Surveillance of internet use and mobile phones


29.03.2020



Beds not at full capacity




31.03.2020



No exponential growth


 Bed occupancy not reached saturation



07.04.2020

"Face masks would have minimal effect"




Transmission slowing

However a new study commissioned on masks, clearly somebody wants them




09.04.2020



Excess deaths linked to fall in GDP

The WHO ~~no conclusive evidence facemasks are effective, yet still a push to find "evidence"


14.04.2020




Deaths plateauing,
transmission in decline

Evidence for facemasks is weak

Deep recession would have significant impact on health

'R' rate below 1 in the community


21.04.2020 





Face mask evidence is weak but advise to wear them anyway

Vaccine immunity will differ from natural immunity






28.04.2020





Virus could last on face mask for up to 7 days

Closer contact than 2m poses very low risk

Borders still open, imported cases could increase
30.04.2020





Plan to vaccinate the entire UK population for flu this winter

01.05.2020






Concern over false negatives, despite "highly accurate PCR"

No concern over false positives

Behavioural scientists promote advise to "maximise adherence"



a
 SAGE 1 minutes: PrecautionPrecautionary SAGE meeting on Wuhan Coronavirus (WN-CoV)  - 22 January 2020ary  
SAGE 2 minutes: Second SAGE meeting on Wuhan Coronavirus - 28 January 2020
SAGE 3 minutes: Third SAGE meeting on Wuhan Coronavirus (WN-CoV) - 3 February 2020
SAGE 4 minutes: Fourth SAGE meeting on Wuhan Coronavirus (WN-CoV) - 4 February 2020
SAGE 5 minutes: Fifth SAGE meeting on Wuhan Coronavirus (WN-CoV) - 6 February 2020
SAGE 6 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 11 February 2020
SAGE 7 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 13 February 2020
SAGE 8 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 18 February 2020
SAGE 9 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 20 February 2020
SAGE 10 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 25 February 2020
SAGE 11 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 27 February 2020
SAGE 12 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 3 March 2020
SAGE 13 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 5 March 2020
SAGE 14 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 10 March 2020
SAGE 15 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 13 March 2020
SAGE 16 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 16 March 2020
SAGE 17 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 18 March 2020
SAGE 18 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 23 March 2020
SAGE 19 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 26 March 2020
SAGE 20 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 29 March 2020
SAGE 21 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 31 March 2020
SAGE 22 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 2 April 2020
SAGE 23 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 7 April 2020
SAGE 24 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 9 April 2020
SAGE 25 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 14 April 2020
SAGE 26 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 16 April 2020
SAGE 27 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 21 April 2020
SAGE 28 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 23 April 2020
SAGE 29 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 28 April 2020
SAGE 30 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 30 April 2020
SAGE 31 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 1 May 2020
SAGE 32 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 1 May 2020
SAGE 33 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 5 May 2020
SAGE 34 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 7 May 2020