SARS-CoV-2-Pathogen: SARS Whistleblowers

Showing posts with label SARS Whistleblowers. Show all posts

Thursday, June 4, 2020

66| Court Petition CoronaFakeVirus

66| BigBrotherWatch Govt Infringements of liberties

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

66| EU's Great Betrayal [China - SARS-COV-2-Pathogen - Covid-19]

EU's Great Betrayal [China - SARS-COV-2-Pathogen - Covid-19]

The diplomatic game of chess is likely to go down to the wire as

China is actively lobbying to escape sanctions and

independent inquiry because the Chinese communist party knows it is

culpable for the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic

Earlier this week it appeared that China is on the backfoot as over 100 countries

rallied behind each other to draft a resolution in the 73rd World Health Assembly

to review the response of the World Health Organization in order to draw lessons

from it.

Interestingly even China backed the proposal which was initially drafted by the

European Union as the world thought that it has taken the first steps to punish

China and the WHO for its sins. However on a closer look it turns out that yet again

China has managed to fool the world.

Australia has been at the forefront of pushing for an independent investigation into

China and had drafted a proposal which demanded an independent inquiry and

threatened to put China In the dock.

China lobbied with the European Union to fool the world and embarrass Australia

as the latter's proposal was silently junked and a watered down proposal was drafted

by the European Union which only called for a review of the WHO response in order

to draw lessons from the response much to China's delight.

The entire world has been fooled by China into thinking that punitive measures havebeen taken by the countries in the 73rd World Health Assembly.

The seven-page proposal does stress on investigating the origins of the virus but desists from

directly mentioning China or Wuhan.

Chinese Communist Party's mouthpiece Global Times could not contain its happiness as

it claimed that Australia got a slap on the face and openly admitted that EU's resolution

Was sponsored by China and the global community has welcomed it.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said it is a totally different thing from

the so called independent inquiry pushed by the Australian side.

Yet again China has been successful in putting out its narrative and needless to say the

proposal which has been signed by over 100 countries is nothing but a hogwash as China

will never sponsor a proposal which can threaten it's narrative.

It is ironical that the European Union which has been arguably worst hit by the

Wuhan virus pandemic is supporting China as it cowers down under Chinese pressure.

As if to rub salt in the wounds the European Union pledged to back the WHO

after US President Donald Trump threatened to pull out of the body if the WHO is

unsuccessful in proving that it is not under Chinese influence.

European Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Virginie Battu-Henriksson said this is

the time for solidarity not the time for finger-pointing or for undermining

multilateral co-operation.

The EU backs the WHO in its efforts to contain and mitigate the Covid-19 outbreak and has already provided additional funding to support these efforts.

In yet another example which portrays how the EU has been compromised

into serving the interests of China it recently watered down a report about

Beijing state backed disinformation campaign fearing that the Dragon would

retaliate by withholding medical supplies.

The reference to China's disinformation campaign essentially

means China's massive propaganda war to portray itself as a saviour

of the world spreading lies like the US Army spread the novel coronavirus

or scapegoating Italy as a part of Covid-19 origin propaganda or an

unnamed Chinese diplomat meddling in the internal affairs of France in an ugly

undiplomatic manner. But this particular section was removed by the EU, why

because Beijing strong-armed it and warned the EU officials of unspecified

repercussions and then the EU gave in to the threats to appease the CCP

Such is the Chinese influence in the European Union that it allowed China

to censor a friendship letter which was co-authored and co-signed by all

European Union ambassadors to China.

The letter mentioned the outbreak

of the corona virus in China and its subsequent spread to the rest of the world

over the past three months has meant there are pre-existing plans have been

temporary side-tracked. But Beijing's state-run media didn't like it and

China Daily published the letter removing this paragraph about the corona virus

pandemic thereby quoting the European Union selectively. But the EU

didn't protest and allowed China to impose its will by censoring parts of

the letter.

Not only did the European Union fail to object but it also consented to

Chinese censorship and manipulation. Battu-Henriksson said EU

diplomats decided to proceed with the publication with considerable

reluctance.

In retrospect it seems that - the United Kingdom's decision to leave

the European Union was the correct one.

While there are obvious economic and trade benefits by being a part of the EU

but if the institution cannot protect the lives of its citizens and directly panders

to the whims and fancies of China despite the fact that the latter's actions have

created havoc in Europe the institution has lost all credibility and no longer

serves the interests of Europe.

Sunday, May 31, 2020

66|0011|171 The timeline of the secret meetings - deliberate intentions to make the people of the UK sick/sicker/sickest/

VOBE 31 May 2020

10:58

This is in progress so please check back & if you could sign the petitions - 323703, 32

huge gaps between evidence provided and policy decisions
throughout resulting in huge policy leaps from meeting to meeting with no evidence as to why

SAGE MEETING DATE
SAGE NOTES

CROWN'S SERVANTS / AGENTS ACTIONS

04.02.2020
"It is possible that school closures would be less effective than in previous epidemics

SAGE heard that NERVTAG advises that there is limited to no evidence of the

benefits of the general public wearing facemasks as preventative measure."

18.02.2020
"Chloroquine represents potential treatment that is low cost and widely available. However, SAGE is unaware of any

clinical trials assessing its effectiveness"

Chloroquine is not mentioned again from this point

25.02.2020
"The risk of public disorder in the UK — defined to include opportunistic crime, community tension and rioting — is assessed to be very low in response to an epidemic"

25.02.2020
"SAGE discussed a paper modelling four non-pharmaceutical interventions: university and school closures, home isolation, household quarantine and social distancing, including use of interventions in combination"
*Lockdown looks like it came from study

27.02.2020
"SAGE reviewed Covid-19 planning assumptions and advised that, in the reasonable worst case scenario, 80% of the UK population may become infected, with an overall 1%
fatality rate in those infected"

03.03.2020
"There is currently no evidence that cancelling large events would be effective"

This is when the behavioural science come to the fore on message and
communication

05.03.2020
"HMG should plan for the introduction of behavioural and social interventions within 1-2 weeks to contain and delay, depending on progress of the epidemic.

SAGE claims that the science supports combination of case isolation and
whole family isolation"

05.03.2020

SAGE agreed there is no evidence to suggest that banning very large
gatherings would reduce transmission. Preventing social interaction in public spaces,
including restaurants and bars, would have an effect, but would be very difficult to
implement.

05.03.2020

Cocooning of older and vulnerable patients can start later, and would have
to continue longer, than other measures.

10.03.2020

Social distancing ("cocooning") is for those 70 and over, as well as those of
any age in vulnerable groups.
The modelling concludes that restricting this group to 70+, rather than 65+
would not cause significant increase in numbers of deaths.

16.03.2020
"The science" suggests additional social distancing measures should be introduced as soon as possible
While SAGE's view remains that school closures constitutes one of the less effective single measure to reduce the epidemic peak, „„it may nevertheless become necessary to
introduce school closures in order to push demand for critical care below

23.03.2020